Hospitals dropping Medicare Advantage because of concerns with patient care

St. Charles Health System, a large hospital system in central Oregon likely will not continue to participate in Medicare Advantage, reports KTVZ.com. The hospital system’s leaders are concerned about patient care in Medicare Advantage. People with Medicare who want to know they have access to the best hospitals, including access to cancer centers of excellence, should switch to traditional Medicare.

St. Charles is not alone; many hospital systems are not taking Medicare Advantage enrollees. St. Charles’ CEO says that the hospital system has considered dropping Medicare Advantage plans for some time because of mounting concerns. He reports that his hospital system is not alone. Hospital systems throughout the country are concerned about patient care in Medicare Advantage. The Mayo Clinic stopped taking Medicare Advantage enrollees at some sites last year.

In the CEO’s words: “The reality of Medicare Advantage in Central Oregon is that it just hasn’t lived up to the promise. A program intended to promote seamless and higher-quality care has instead become a fragmented patchwork of administrative delays, denials, and frustrations. The sicker you are, the more hurdles you and your care teams face. Our insurance partners need to do better, especially when nurses, physicians and other caregivers are reporting high levels of burnout and job dissatisfaction.”

The American Hospital Association (AHA), the trade association for most hospitals reports that it “is increasingly concerned about certain (Medicare Advantage) plan policies that restrict or delay patient access to care, which also add cost and burden to the health care system.” To make matters worse, it appears that some Medicare Advantage plans are engaged in fraud as well as inappropriate delays and denials of care and coverage.

St. Charles hospital executives see higher rates of denials of care in Medicare Advantage and long arduous processes for getting Medicare Advantage plans to approve medically necessary care. St. Charles health system is considering whether it will renew Medicare Advantage contracts with PacificSource, Humana, HealthNet and WellCare.

The bottom line: With traditional Medicare, your treating physicians call the shots, deciding what care is medically reasonable and necessary, and Medicare covers that care, without second-guessing and coming between you and your doctors. With Medicare Advantage, many insurance companies second guess treating physicians and deny care or delay care, endangering patient health.

The Office of the Inspector General has reported widespread and persistent inappropriate delays and denials of care and coverage in Medicare Advantage. But, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has so far refused to identify the bad actors or sanction them appropriately, putting older adults and people with disabilities at serious risk.

Healthy patients in Medicare Advantage should be fine. But, even if you are healthy today, you could need complex care tomorrow and your insurance should cover that care. That’s why we have health insurance. In some Medicare Advantage plans, you might not get needed care in a timely manner, if at all, regardless of whether you need it.

Here’s more from Just Care:

Comments

5 responses to “Hospitals dropping Medicare Advantage because of concerns with patient care”

  1. Shawnna Avatar
    Shawnna

    Saying people can just switch to traditional Medicare shows a lack of knowledge of facts. Unless CMS grants a special enrollment period, those on Medicare Advantage for more than one year will have to pass medical underwriting to purchase a Medicare Supplement policy if they switch back to traditional Medicare. Without Medicare Supplement, beneficiaries face significant out of pocket costs with just traditional Medicare alone.

    1. Diane Archer Avatar
      Diane Archer

      You are so right. Most people are trapped in Medicare Advantage once they sign up. They can switch to traditional Medicare but with no limit on out of pocket costs. Unless they live in Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut or Maine, they have no right to buy supplemental coverage to protect them from financial risk. Some insurers could offer them coverage, but the coverage could be prohibitively costly.

  2. Joann Avatar
    Joann

    I agree, traditional Medicare is better, but it doesn’t cover enough and has no out of pocket maximum, so without supplemental coverage, it’s not financially feasible for a lot of people, myself included. Good supplemental plans are out of reach financially for some people (again, myself included) and when we did have traditional Medicare with supplemental from an employer, Medicare denied care on more than one occasion, and without the supplemental coverage we would not have been able to afford the care needed. Change is needed, which would mean strengthening Medicare, increasing coverage and including an out of pocket maximum (I know I’m preaching to the choir), but for now, Medicare and supplemental is not affordable for everyone.

    1. Melinda Avatar

      I hate it when people say Medicare with a Supplement is not affordable. As if a Medicare Advantage plan is… with out-of-pocket spending limits up to $8,300 in-network! That’s almost $700/mo if you are in bad shape! Makes Original Medicare with a Plan G supp, averaging about $183/mo, look pretty good.

      Healthcare is NOT free. Expecting it to be so is not helping. We all need to do a better job of budgeting for our needs.

      1. Diane Archer Avatar
        Diane Archer

        For sure, Medicare Advantage is far less affordable than Traditional Medicare for people who need a lot of health care. But, the upfront costs of Traditional Medicare with supplemental coverage are far higher than the upfront costs of MA. People who are relatively healthy do save money in MA. Problem is that insurance is about protecting yourself for the times you need health care.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *