Tag: Eligibility

  • Four ways Congress could weaken Medicare

    Four ways Congress could weaken Medicare

    Much like Social Security, Americans across the political spectrum prize Medicare. Medicare provides the anchor for their health security if they are over 65 or have a disability and offers peace of mind to their families. People love Medicare—a government health insurance program—even though they don’t love government. But, Republicans in Congress want to transform Medicare as we know it, turn it into a voucher program, even though it would mean shifting more costs to older adults, people with disabilities and their families.

    Here are four ways Congressional leaders could weaken Medicare if Trump becomes President.

    1. Republicans in Congress want to privatize Medicare and turn it into a defined contribution program. They want to give people with Medicare a voucher that contributes to some of the cost of their health care coverage and make them pay the rest. Congress could limit the amount of the voucher from one year to the next, shifting more costs to people with Medicare. They want to move Medicare from a defined benefit program covering all the care people need, to a defined contribution program. Sometimes they call this “premium support.” But, whatever you call it, it would inevitably mean forcing people to pay more for their health care. Commercial insurers likely would have few constraints on the premiums, deductibles and copays they charged, and people with Medicare would be left largely on their own to afford them.
    2. Republicans in Congress want to do away with traditional Medicare. Seven out of ten people with Medicare still opt for traditional Medicare because it gives them the wide choice of doctors and hospitals anywhere in the country and the ease of access that they value. It is also extremely cost-effective, spending only two percent of its budget on administrative costs. And, it has done a far better job of reining costs than Medicare Advantage plans, offered by commercial insurers; at the same time, it has helped ensure the Medicare Advantage plans keep their costs in check to remain competitive. Moreover, the federal government is able to drive improvements to the health care system through traditional Medicare. Regardless, Republicans in Congress want to eliminate traditional Medicare, reducing people’s access to doctors and hospitals and driving up health care costs.
    3. Republicans in Congress want to means-test Medicare even further. Like Social Security, Medicare is an earned benefit. People contribute to Medicare throughout their working life. Medicare covers people in America over 65 and people with disabilities who have paid in, regardless of their health or wealth. Already, Congress has passed a law forcing about six percent of people with Medicare—individuals with incomes over $85,000 and couples with incomes over $170, 000—to pay more for Medicare. Republicans in Congress want to increase premiums for middle-class and wealthier Americans even further threatening Medicare’s affordability. Also, the more that these individuals are asked to pay for Medicare, the more Congress positions Medicare as a welfare program and erodes support for Medicare.
    4. Republicans in Congress want to raise the age of Medicare eligibility. People eligible for Medicare based on age can enroll when they are 65. Republican leaders want to raise the age at which people can enroll in Medicare to 67. Many Americans depend upon Medicare to provide them with health care coverage once they lose their employer coverage. While they can enroll in the state health insurance exchanges, the state exchanges provide neither the broad choice of doctors and hospitals nor the continuity of care that Medicare offers. Easy access to doctors and hospitals as well as continuity of care are especially important for older adults who use three times more health care than people under 65.
  • Trump, Republican platform on Social Security, Medicare and health care

    Trump, Republican platform on Social Security, Medicare and health care

    Trump has not spent much time talking about his vision for Social Security, Medicare and health care. But, were he to become president, he has promised on day one to ask Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act. And, while Trump’s campaign web site makes no mention of Medicare or Social Security, the Republican Party platform–Trump’s party platform–would cut and privatize Social Security and Medicare benefits. In short, if Trump is elected, health, financial and retirement security would be at serious risk for tens of millions of Americans.

    To be clear, the 2016 Republican Party platform does not explicitly state that the Republicans support these cuts. Rather, it says: “we oppose tax increases and believe in the power of markets to create wealth and to help secure the future of our Social Security system.”  You can check out Social Security Works’ annotated version of the Social Security section of the platform, translating the text, here.

    Republicans say they will leave Medicare as is for people 55 and over. But, if Republicans have their way, when people under 55 today turn 65 and become eligible for Medicare, they will likely have far higher costs and far less choice of doctors and hospitals.

    In ten years’ time, Republicans want to cap the amount that the government contributes to people’s care, moving Medicare from a defined benefit program covering all the care people need, to a defined contribution or “premium support” program that would likely cut benefits and shift more out-of-pocket health care costs to people. Republicans also likely want to privatize Medicare, a recipe for limiting choice of providers and driving up health care costs rather than reining them in.

    The Republican platform also suggests that Republicans continue to want to raise the age of eligibility for Social Security and Medicare and further means-test Medicare. It calls for “setting a more realistic age for [Medicare] eligibility.”

    On his  web site, Donald Trump recognizes the high price of prescription drugs. He calls for allowing people to import drugs at lower prices from abroad in the spirit of free trade. “Allowing consumers access to imported, safe and dependable drugs from overseas will bring more options to consumers.”

    For Trump’s views on Social Security and Medicare over the last 17 years, check on the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare’s interactive timeline.

    Here’s more from Just Care:

  • Older eligibility for Medicare is not wiser

    Older eligibility for Medicare is not wiser

    Older eligibility for Medicare is not wiser. Raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 actually ends up costing twice as much as it saves according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. And, it would hurt millions of older adults who would need to wait two more years to be eligible for Medicare as well as increase costs for people with Medicare.

    How would it affect you financially? It depends on where you live, where you work and how much you earn.  Kaiser estimates the net increase in out-of pocket expenses for people at $3.7 billion. An estimated third of older adults would save money; however the two-thirds of older adults would be faced with greater out-of-pocket expenses.

    The average increase per person would be $2,200. People who qualify for Medicaid typically would pay less. People who need to enroll in a state health exchange may pay more or less based on income and eligibility for federal help paying premiums. People covered under their employers’ plan, both actively working and retired, would typically need to pay more.

    Furthermore, if 65 and 66 year-olds are not paying into Medicare, Medicare loses their premium contributions. Since they are the youngest Medicare enrollees, they help subsidize the cost of older enrollees.  Without their enrollment in Medicare, premiums will also rise for everyone enrolled in Medicare. To make matters worse, if these 65 and 66 year-olds enroll in the state exchanges, as the oldest enrollees, their premiums will be the highest.How much does raising the Medicare eligibility age really help the federal budget?

    By eliminating coverage of 65 and 66 year olds, it would save $31.1 billion over ten years. But overall health care spending would rise because individuals, employers and states would be spending substantially more. The net federal savings would actually only be $5.7 billion, and it would cost individuals (and their employers, and states) $11.8 billion in 2014.

    Read more about this issue from the Kaiser Family Foundation here.