Social Security What's Buzzing

President Obama’s 2016 budget relatively good on Social Security

Written by Diane Archer

While the President’s proposed Medicare policies leave a lot to be desired, he gets it right on Social Security. The President proposes to move tax revenue from the Social Security retirement fund to the Social Security disability fund, which would otherwise not be able to pay full benefits towards the end of 2016.

Under the President’s plan, both the Social Security retirement fund and the disability fund would be able to pay full benefits until 2033. Without a reallocation, Social Security disability benefits to 11 million Americans would be cut by almost one-fifth (19 percent). Since the typical benefit is about $1150 a month, many severely disabled individuals would see their incomes fall well below poverty.

But, there will likely be a big fight on this proposal since the House Republicans passed a rule in January that would hold a transfer between the two funds hostage unless there is a plan in place to cut Social Security benefits overall. They are prepared to put millions of vulnerable Americans at risk. Notwithstanding how difficult it is to get disability benefitsthey incorrectly argue that many of the people receiving benefits do not deserve them.

Reallocating money from the retirement fund to the disability fund should be a simple process.  And, in fact, such transfers have happened 11 times in the past with a bipartisan vote.

To the President’s credit, his budget proposal insists that “Any reforms should strengthen retirement security for the most vulnerable, including low-income seniors, and should maintain robust disability and survivors’ benefits.”  But, the budget proposal also gives him wiggle room to make cuts: “The Administration will oppose any measures that privatize or weaken the Social Security system and will not accept an approach that slashes benefits for future generations or reduces basic benefits for current beneficiaries.”

Of note, there’s a very easy fix to the solvency of the Social Security Disability Trust Fund that does not require a transfer. Raising the payroll tax by just .20  percent for both workers and employers would ensure people continued to receive their full Social Security Disability benefits for the next 75 years. And there is strong evidence that Americans would support a far larger payroll tax increase to strengthen Social Security overall.

Social Security benefits in the United States are far stingier than in other countries.  Eliminating the cap on Social Security payroll contributions ($117,000 today), as is the case with Medicare payroll contributions, would help strengthen Social Security and ensure its solvency for many decades to come.

FacebookTwitterPrintFriendlyComment

2 Comments

  • Just because wealthy Republications don’t need help from anywhere to pay their health bills does not mean everyone else doesn’t need help. If they don’t want the government to give that help, perhaps they would consider doing it themselves. Whatever happened to love your neighbor and care for those who need help? Perhaps you need to dig out your copy the Bible and read what it says about this.

  • I live on Social Security Disability. It’s no picnic. When I was able to work I earned in two days what disability now pays me per month. The republican attack on benefits that I paid for out of every paycheck for over 30 years are cruel and malicious. People who attack the elderly and the disabled are unfit to govern. If their cuts are allowed I no longer eat. As it is now I barely get through each month by existing on a near starvation diet that allows two small meals a day. Cut that by 20 percent and I suffer malnutrition. Meanwhile they fight to give billionaires more huge tax cuts. These bums shame us as a nation.

Leave a Comment

Read previous post:
401(K)2012
How to choose a doctor

When it’s time to see a doctor and you don’t know whom to use, most of us decide in one...

Close