Four things to think about when choosing between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans

There are four important factors to consider when choosing between traditional Medicare, which is administered by the federal government, and Medicare Advantage plans, which are administered by corporate health insurers that contract with the government: 1. Coverage, 2. Access, 3. Incentives and 4. Cost.
  1. Coverage: Both traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans cover the same benefit package of medically necessary care. But, Medicare Advantage plans typically cover 25 percent fewer services than traditional Medicare because they tend to take a narrow view of what care is medically necessary and profit more the less care they cover. Traditional Medicare covers care from most doctors and hospitals in the United States.  Medicare Advantage plans generally cover care only from doctors and hospitals in their network and, often, only in your area, except in emergencies or urgent care situations. Medicare Advantage plans generally offer some additional benefits. For more information on the fundamental differences between Medicare Advantage fee-for-service plans and traditional Medicare, click here.
  2. Access: With traditional Medicare, you are covered for all medically necessary care without a referral or prior authorization.  For more information on the easy access you have with traditional Medicare, click here. With a Medicare Advantage plan, you often must have a referral from a primary care physician or prior authorization from your Medicare Advantage plan in order for your care to be covered.
  3. Incentives: With traditional Medicare, your doctors and hospitals have every incentive to provide you with all the care they think you need because traditional Medicare will pay for it. That can lead to overtreatment. Medicare Advantage plans receive a fixed amount from the government to cover your care regardless of how much they spend on your care. Consequently, they might offer incentives for their network doctors and hospitals to withhold needed care. The less money a Medicare Advantage plan spends on your care, the more money the Medicare Advantage plan has for its shareholders. To learn more, read this blog post by Diane Archer and Theodore Marmor on the fundamental difference between traditional Medicare and private insurance.
  4. Cost: Traditional Medicare has no out-of-pocket cap, so you need extra insurance to fill coverage gaps. Some people get this additional insurance from former employers, some buy an individual “Medigap” or Medicare supplemental insurance policy and some qualify for Medicaid, which fills gaps, because their income is low.  With this extra insurance, you will have few if any out-of-pocket costs when you get medical or hospital care. You also need prescription drug coverage, if not through Medicaid or a former employer, through a Medicare Part D drug plan. Without this extra insurance, if you need a lot of costly care, your out-of-pocket costs could be astronomical. With a Medicare Advantage plan, you cannot buy extra insurance to fill coverage gaps. So, unless you can afford copays and deductibles, you might have to forgo care. Depending upon the Medicare Advantage plan, you can be liable for up to $7,550 in out-of-pockets costs–copays, coinsurance and deductibles–for your in-network care alone.  If you are in a Medicare Advantage HMO, there is generally no limit to your out-of-pocket costs if you use doctors who are out of network. If you are in a PPO, your out-of-pocket cap can be as high as $11,300.

For up-to-date advice you can trust, subscribe to Just Care’s free weekly newsfeed here or by clicking the orange button below.

Here’s more from Just Care on choosing a health plan:

.

Comments

3 responses to “Four things to think about when choosing between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans”

  1. Laurel Peters Avatar

    I found this article to be filled with incorrect statements. I’ve been on Medicare for 9 yrs. Medicare alone was just a tad better than the insurance I paid for before ,age 65. So after a year, I took MediGap insurance to supplement, it was great ,but the override in cost was more than my deductibles ai was saving. Finally I settl d on Medicare Advantage. It was and still is the best bang for my buck. $19.00 more a month included drugs health club, eyes, hearing and d natal. None of which were included in MediGap or Traditional Medicare. My Medicare goes up every year (@65 it was under 140. Mo) now up to 170+ mon. Whereas my advantage started out at 18. Mo and has only escalated to $19. Mo after several years. The deductibles have gone up 10.00 a claim but most visits have no deductible , so where’s this awful advantage being taken????

    1. Diane Archer Avatar
      Diane Archer

      Thanks for your comment, Laurel. It sounds as if you are satisfied with your Medicare Advantage plan at the moment. Many people are. And, your Medicare Advantage plan might not be engaged in widespread inappropriate delays and denials of care and coverage, as some are, according to the Office of the Inspector General. The disadvantage of Medicare Advantage is often not evident until people develop costly and complex conditions and either cannot get the care they need from the health care providers they want to use in a timely manner or cannot afford the out-of-pocket costs, which can be triple the cost of Medicare supplemental coverage–up to $7,550 for in-network care alone–in a single year.

      1. Kathleen Waybourn Avatar
        Kathleen Waybourn

        Exactly my 89 year old mother’s problem now when she was hospitalized for a non-displaced fracture of her tibia and discharged to a rehabilitation nursing home. She received therapy daily I was advised but I did not live there to see it. She was then denied coverage for rehabilitation in nursing home because similar care could be provided at home. She arrived hame and had been bedridden with a brace on her fractured leg ever since. She is able to stand but is weak mostly and needs human nearby to prevent any possible falls. I cannot fulfill this humans need because I am in danger of paralysis due to sciatica so I immediately hired home health aides from two agencies to assist. I could not find any agency willing to provide any aides for 3-4 hours in morning and 3-4 hours in evening up to bedtime. Insurance initially only approved 3 hours for 3 days per week. This need for therapy was fulfilled at 3 x per week but is now being cut off after one month. She still needs to be bedridden until her bone heals based upon x-ray examination. This might be another month. She cannot easily get out of the house without a major unsafe production of sparse assistance available for such needs.

Leave a Reply to Laurel Peters Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *