President Trump calls to reduce payroll contributions, threatening Social Security

Last week, President Trump called for a reduction in payroll contributions–lower employee and employer Medicare and Social Security payments. Of course, this would mean less money in the Medicare and Social Security Trust Funds. It would deplete their reserves and their ability to pay out people’s benefits at the level they do today.

Nancy Altman, President of Social Security Works, commented that President Trump’s insistence on reducing payroll contributions is not an appropriate response to the coronavirus pandemic. It’s inefficient and does not help anyone who has been laid off from work, the people who need money most.

In fact, President Trump now says he supports reducing payroll contributions permanently. In his words, “The payroll tax cut would be a great thing for this country.” He wants a way to justify cutting Social Security benefits.

Trump’s proposal jeopardizes Social Security. Social Security is self-financing, not adding any money to the deficit. It depends on payroll contributions to support itself. Workers pay in to protect themselves against lost wages after they retire, or leave their jobs because of disability, or lose a spouse.

In the words of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, “We put those payroll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and their unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.”

Over several decades, politicians have tried unsuccessfully to privatize Social Security. They’ve tried cutting benefits through a chained CPI and means testing. Today, the Trump administration is trying to deprive it of needed funds, “starve the beast.”

Right now, the federal government should be working as hard as possible to get people money, not finding ways to deprive them of their long-term financial security.

Here’s more from Just Care:

Comments

2 responses to “President Trump calls to reduce payroll contributions, threatening Social Security”

  1. Don Pew Avatar
    Don Pew

    This is seriously looking like THE END. Satan has purchased our planet using capitalism. Purchased whores (our leaders) have unwittingly doomed us all.

  2. BC Shelby Avatar

    …this is little more than one more Republican ploy to bleed Social Security dry and set it up for failure so it can either be eliminated or privatises (handed over to the Wall Street Casino). We who have retired all have paid into this and nobody else but us and future generations should benefit from it. Many like myself didn’t have any significant savings thanks to stagnant low wages and rising costs (particularly housing and medications which have been skyrocketing since the recession). For younger generations the situation is even more bleak, and reducing the source of funding would put them even deeper into poverty than many of us are. The living cost adjustments are a joke as they really don’t keep up with “real life” costs (particularly rent and medications). For example, where I live (classified as subsidised low income housing) we were just hit with a second consecutive rent increase. Last year’s increase pretty much wiped out the LCA I received, this year it exceeded the LCA by 10$.

    What really needs to happen is that the cap needs to be eliminated as many are calling for. These people in Congress, many of whom are already affluent if not downright wealthy, not only receive a generous pension when they retire (or are voted out) on the taxpayers’ dime, but they also are collect Social Security on top of it at the maximum benefit level. Meanwhile a majority of their constituents, whom they are supposed to be representing, only have SS (which is supported solely by worker/employer contributions) to look forward to if they retire or no longer able to work a steady job these days.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *